Criminal Defense Investigators is specially trained professionals that gather evidence and information for the defense in any criminal case. While the prosecuting authorities have many analysts (e.g., police officers, forensic psychologists, and other prosecution detectives) on hand to analyze and collect evidence, many defendants gamble with the idea of engaging an investigator on their case free of charge. However, engaging an investigator to review and gather evidence presents several significant risks. In many cases, criminal defense attorneys may be able to get the charges against their clients dismissed if the investigators improperly gathered evidence or sources, and relied on tainted or inaccurate information. Additionally, the presence of an investigator presents a safeguard against planting drugs or weapons on the scene of a crime scene or injuring a suspect in an illegal investigation.
There are two main objectives of criminal defense investigators. First, they investigate any crimes that have been committed. Second, they serve as witnesses in court to the effect of the crimes. This allows them to provide testimony about the circumstances surrounding the events leading up to the occurrence of the crime.
Unfortunately, there are a number of myths associated with criminal defense investigators. One myth is that they must have inside knowledge of the crime in order to effectively perform their investigative duties. Many law enforcement officials believe this myth because it enables them to avoid hiring witnesses who may have special knowledge regarding the commission of the crime. Some police officers believe that only seasoned law enforcement agents can effectively perform such an investigation.
The truth is there are a number of private investigators who are skilled in performing investigations that involve confidential sources. This means that they may need to hire a private investigator that has previous law enforcement experience or connections. A qualified private investigator is often referred to as an Intelligence Analyst. Intelligence analysts are needed by both the private investigation industry and the criminal justice system. An Intelligence Analyst has the ability to gather intelligence information from a variety of sources that is relevant to both the case being handled as well as the individuals being questioned.
Many law enforcement officers mistakenly believe that private investigators are required to be “undercover” agents. While it is true that they sometimes must work in pairs or in teams to collect evidence or to interview suspects, this is not the norm. A reputable private investigator will always use their best efforts to remain completely “undercover” while conducting criminal defense investigations. Many criminal defense investigators choose not to wear uniforms at all. When they are not wearing a uniform, an investigator’s success is based on his or her discretion and skill.
Another myth is that private investigators are only needed in cases where there is “clearly evidentiary evidence.” Nothing could be further from the truth. A great many criminal defense investigators consult with prosecutors in cases where they have solid intelligence evidence pointing to the innocence or guilt of a particular person. Good investigators do not perform any “dirty tricks” to help their clients win their cases.
There are a number of different types of criminal defense investigations. Some of the most common include: bail investigations, death penalty investigations, missing persons investigations, kidnapping investigations, foreclosures, abuse investigation and civil lawsuits. Private investigators may also conduct interviews of witnesses for a case or may provide extra investigation services to lawyers and law enforcement officers. If the suspect is known to be “confidential”, meaning that he or she has been charged with one crime but has either remained hidden or is presently protected under a lawyer, then an investigator may be called in to interview the suspect directly.
While Perron’s case did end up being widely publicized, it did not affect his stellar reputation among criminal defense investigators. Even though Perron had been cleared of any wrong doing, he was no closer to hiring an attorney. Because of this, Perron’s investigation remains open. Whether or not he was really cleared remains unknown. His attorneys could not even confirm whether or not he had been cleared.